Design Systems · Evaluation
Material 3
Compliance Index score
59/100 · F
↑ 3.0 pts since last week (56 → 59)
Per-category breakdown
Each category is scored independently. The cohort average shows how this site compares to the 30-site cohort in each dimension.
Evaluation
Material 3 scores 59/F on the Designesy Compliance Index — 6 of 40 checks passed, 4 failed, 22 warned, 5 skipped. The cohort mean is 62.2/D across 30 scored sites. Material 3 sits 5% below the cohort mean.
Strongest category: Identity at 75.0%. Weakest scored category: Interaction at 0.0%. The gap between best and worst is the finding — most systems are strong in one dimension and absent in another.
Since last week's score, Material 3 improved by 3.0 points — moving from 56 to 59.
The engine detected 158 custom properties at :root — a rich token layer. The question is whether those tokens are structured (primitive → semantic → component) or flat.
F-grade means Material 3 scores below 60 — the contract's pass threshold. The failing checks are not subjective: they are missing CSS primitives that the contract requires at :root.
This evaluation is deterministic — no LLM, no human judgment, no survey. The same 40-check engine that scored Material 3 scores every site on the leaderboard. Re-score m3.material.io live to see if anything has changed since 2026-08-03.
Scored 2026-08-03 against contract v0.4.0 (40 checks, 14 weighted categories). Re-scored weekly via GitHub Action.
Compared to Design Systems peers
Material 3 ranks #9 of 14 in the Design Systems category.
Cohort context
This site
59/100
Cohort mean
62.2/100
Cohort median
62.6/100
Delta from mean
-3.2
Why this site is scored
MotionScheme + Sound — closest to designesy combo