SaaS · Evaluation
Linear
Compliance Index score
68.6/100 · D
↑ 1.4 pts since last week (67.2 → 68.6)
Per-category breakdown
Each category is scored independently. The cohort average shows how this site compares to the 30-site cohort in each dimension.
Evaluation
Linear scores 68.6/D on the Designesy Compliance Index — 18 of 40 checks passed, 5 failed, 13 warned, 1 skipped. The cohort mean is 62.2/D across 30 scored sites. Linear sits 10% above the cohort mean.
Strongest category: Poise at 100.0%. Weakest scored category: Accessibility at 40.0%. The gap between best and worst is the finding — most systems are strong in one dimension and absent in another.
Since last week's score, Linear improved by 1.4 points — moving from 67.2 to 68.6.
The engine detected 192 custom properties at :root — a rich token layer. The question is whether those tokens are structured (primitive → semantic → component) or flat.
This evaluation is deterministic — no LLM, no human judgment, no survey. The same 40-check engine that scored Linear scores every site on the leaderboard. Re-score linear.app live to see if anything has changed since 2026-08-03.
Scored 2026-08-03 against contract v0.4.0 (40 checks, 14 weighted categories). Re-scored weekly via GitHub Action.
Compared to SaaS peers
Linear ranks #2 of 6 in the SaaS category.
Cohort context
This site
68.6/100
Cohort mean
62.2/100
Cohort median
62.6/100
Delta from mean
+6.4
Why this site is scored
Frontier reference — invariant-craft tier