SaaS · Evaluation
Figma
Compliance Index score
76.6/100 · C
= flat since last week
Per-category breakdown
Each category is scored independently. The cohort average shows how this site compares to the 30-site cohort in each dimension.
Evaluation
Figma scores 76.6/C on the Designesy Compliance Index — 18 of 42 checks passed, 1 failed, 9 warned, 11 skipped. The cohort mean is 69.3/D across 30 scored sites. Figma sits 11% above the cohort mean.
Strongest category: Takt at 100.0%. Weakest scored category: Motion at 50.0%. The gap between best and worst is the finding — most systems are strong in one dimension and absent in another.
The engine detected 102 custom properties at :root — a rich token layer. The question is whether those tokens are structured (primitive → semantic → component) or flat.
This evaluation is deterministic — no LLM, no human judgment, no survey. The same 42-check engine that scored Figma scores every site on the leaderboard. Re-score figma.com live to see if anything has changed since 2026-08-03.
Scored 2026-08-03 against contract v0.4.0 (42 checks, 14 weighted categories). Re-scored weekly via GitHub Action.
Compared to SaaS peers
Figma ranks #2 of 6 in the SaaS category.
Cohort context
This site
76.6/100
Cohort mean
69.3/100
Cohort median
70.0/100
Delta from mean
+7.3
Why this site is scored
Design tool surface — token workflow origin