SaaS · Evaluation
Figma
Compliance Index score
68.1/100 · D
↓ 5.0 pts since last week (73.1 → 68.1)
Per-category breakdown
Each category is scored independently. The cohort average shows how this site compares to the 30-site cohort in each dimension.
Evaluation
Figma scores 68.1/D on the Designesy Compliance Index — 17 of 40 checks passed, 4 failed, 14 warned, 2 skipped. The cohort mean is 62.2/D across 30 scored sites. Figma sits 10% above the cohort mean.
Strongest category: Takt at 100.0%. Weakest scored category: Motion at 50.0%. The gap between best and worst is the finding — most systems are strong in one dimension and absent in another.
Since last week's score, Figma dropped by 5.0 points — moving from 73.1 to 68.1.
The engine detected 102 custom properties at :root — a rich token layer. The question is whether those tokens are structured (primitive → semantic → component) or flat.
This evaluation is deterministic — no LLM, no human judgment, no survey. The same 40-check engine that scored Figma scores every site on the leaderboard. Re-score figma.com live to see if anything has changed since 2026-08-03.
Scored 2026-08-03 against contract v0.4.0 (40 checks, 14 weighted categories). Re-scored weekly via GitHub Action.
Compared to SaaS peers
Figma ranks #4 of 6 in the SaaS category.
Cohort context
This site
68.1/100
Cohort mean
62.2/100
Cohort median
62.6/100
Delta from mean
+5.9
Why this site is scored
Design tool surface — token workflow origin