Talk to the Director →
designesy.

SaaS · Evaluation

GitHub

github.com

F58.099999999999994/100

Compliance Index score

58.099999999999994/100 · F

21 pass6 fail8 warn2 skip585 tokens

11.9 pts since last week (70 → 58.099999999999994)

Re-score live →View leaderboard

Per-category breakdown

Each category is scored independently. The cohort average shows how this site compares to the 30-site cohort in each dimension.

Cadence83.3%(cohort: 60.1%)
9 pass · 1 fail · 2 warn · 0 skip · 18% weight
Accessibility50.0%(cohort: 58.4%)
1 pass · 1 fail · 3 warn · 1 skip · 15% weight
Semanticunscored
0 pass · 0 fail · 0 warn · 0 skip · 12% weight
Motion50.0%(cohort: 52.5%)
2 pass · 2 fail · 0 warn · 0 skip · 10% weight
Tokens50.0%(cohort: 40.8%)
1 pass · 1 fail · 0 warn · 0 skip · 9% weight
Takt50.0%(cohort: 50.8%)
1 pass · 1 fail · 0 warn · 0 skip · 8% weight
Poise100.0%(cohort: 75.0%)
2 pass · 0 fail · 0 warn · 1 skip · 7% weight
Identity75.0%(cohort: 83.3%)
1 pass · 0 fail · 1 warn · 0 skip · 6% weight
Interaction100.0%(cohort: 60.0%)
1 pass · 0 fail · 0 warn · 0 skip · 6% weight
Performanceunscored
0 pass · 0 fail · 0 warn · 0 skip · 6% weight
Responsiveunscored
0 pass · 0 fail · 0 warn · 0 skip · 3% weight

Evaluation

GitHub scores 58.099999999999994/F on the Designesy Compliance Index — 21 of 40 checks passed, 6 failed, 8 warned, 2 skipped. The cohort mean is 62.2/D across 30 scored sites. GitHub sits 7% below the cohort mean.

Strongest category: Poise at 100.0%. Weakest scored category: Accessibility at 50.0%. The gap between best and worst is the finding — most systems are strong in one dimension and absent in another.

Since last week's score, GitHub dropped by 11.9 points — moving from 70 to 58.099999999999994.

The engine detected 585 custom properties at :root — a rich token layer. The question is whether those tokens are structured (primitive → semantic → component) or flat.

F-grade means GitHub scores below 60 — the contract's pass threshold. The failing checks are not subjective: they are missing CSS primitives that the contract requires at :root.

This evaluation is deterministic — no LLM, no human judgment, no survey. The same 40-check engine that scored GitHub scores every site on the leaderboard. Re-score github.com live to see if anything has changed since 2026-08-03.

Scored 2026-08-03 against contract v0.4.0 (40 checks, 14 weighted categories). Re-scored weekly via GitHub Action.

Compared to SaaS peers

GitHub ranks #6 of 6 in the SaaS category.

Cohort context

This site

58.099999999999994/100

Cohort mean

62.2/100

Cohort median

62.6/100

Delta from mean

-4.1

Why this site is scored

High-traffic dev surface — Primer in production

← All evaluationsRe-score GitHub live →