Consumer · Evaluation
X
Compliance Index score
73.1/100 · C
↑ 3.0 pts since last week (70.1 → 73.1)
Per-category breakdown
Each category is scored independently. The cohort average shows how this site compares to the 30-site cohort in each dimension.
Evaluation
X scores 73.1/C on the Designesy Compliance Index — 14 of 40 checks passed, 2 failed, 18 warned, 3 skipped. The cohort mean is 62.2/D across 30 scored sites. X sits 18% above the cohort mean.
Strongest category: Poise at 100.0%. Weakest scored category: Tokens at 25.0%. The gap between best and worst is the finding — most systems are strong in one dimension and absent in another.
Since last week's score, X improved by 3.0 points — moving from 70.1 to 73.1.
The engine detected 166 custom properties at :root — a rich token layer. The question is whether those tokens are structured (primitive → semantic → component) or flat.
This evaluation is deterministic — no LLM, no human judgment, no survey. The same 40-check engine that scored X scores every site on the leaderboard. Re-score x.com live to see if anything has changed since 2026-08-03.
Scored 2026-08-03 against contract v0.4.0 (40 checks, 14 weighted categories). Re-scored weekly via GitHub Action.
Cohort context
This site
73.1/100
Cohort mean
62.2/100
Cohort median
62.6/100
Delta from mean
+10.9
Why this site is scored
High-traffic consumer surface — a11y calibration