Cultural · Evaluation
V&A Museum
Compliance Index score
62.6/100 · D
↑ 1.2 pts since last week (61.4 → 62.6)
Per-category breakdown
Each category is scored independently. The cohort average shows how this site compares to the 30-site cohort in each dimension.
Evaluation
V&A Museum scores 62.6/D on the Designesy Compliance Index — 13 of 40 checks passed, 5 failed, 17 warned, 2 skipped. The cohort mean is 62.2/D across 30 scored sites. V&A Museum sits 1% above the cohort mean.
Strongest category: Identity at 100.0%. Weakest scored category: Tokens at 25.0%. The gap between best and worst is the finding — most systems are strong in one dimension and absent in another.
Since last week's score, V&A Museum improved by 1.2 points — moving from 61.4 to 62.6.
The engine detected 46 custom properties at :root — a modest token layer.
This evaluation is deterministic — no LLM, no human judgment, no survey. The same 40-check engine that scored V&A Museum scores every site on the leaderboard. Re-score vam.ac.uk live to see if anything has changed since 2026-08-03.
Scored 2026-08-03 against contract v0.4.0 (40 checks, 14 weighted categories). Re-scored weekly via GitHub Action.
Cohort context
This site
62.6/100
Cohort mean
62.2/100
Cohort median
62.6/100
Delta from mean
+0.4
Why this site is scored
Pentagram brand identity case study