Pentagram

Pentagram scores 41.1/F on the Designesy Compliance Index — 11 of 40 checks passed, 5 failed, 19 warned, 2 skipped. The cohort mean is 62.2/D across 30 scored sites. Pentagram sits 34% below the cohort mean.

Strongest category: Poise at 75.0%. Weakest scored category: Interaction at 0.0%. The gap between best and worst is the finding — most systems are strong in one dimension and absent in another.

Since last week's score, Pentagram dropped by 16.0 points — moving from 57.1 to 41.1.

The engine detected 181 custom properties at :root — a rich token layer. The question is whether those tokens are structured (primitive → semantic → component) or flat.

F-grade means Pentagram scores below 60 — the contract's pass threshold. The failing checks are not subjective: they are missing CSS primitives that the contract requires at :root.

This evaluation is deterministic — no LLM, no human judgment, no survey. The same 40-check engine that scored Pentagram scores every site on the leaderboard. Re-score pentagram.com live to see if anything has changed since 2026-08-03.