<!-- Generated from /review at build time. Do not edit by hand. -->
<!-- Source of truth: the rendered page. A hand edit here is overwritten on the next build. -->

# Designesy — /review

Canonical page: https://www.designesy.org/review

---

## Review

Review leads with consequences and evidence.

Designesy Review is the quality-control layer for interfaces, products, artifacts, identity systems, design systems, agent output, and environmental or experiential design. It evaluates purpose, clarity, context, inclusion, system coherence, durability, delight, responsibility, and verification proof.

## Review dimensions

### Purpose

What is the design trying to make possible? Which elements directly support that purpose? What can be removed without weakening action?

### Clarity

Is the primary action discoverable? Does the form suggest use? Do labels, hierarchy, layout, and motion reduce uncertainty?

### Context

Where and when will this be used? What constraints shape the experience: device, bandwidth, attention, lighting, language, ability, stress, social setting, maintenance?

### Inclusion

Who benefits most? Who has to work harder? What assumptions about body, language, culture, knowledge, money, or technology are embedded?

### System coherence

Does this follow an existing system? If it breaks the system, is the reason explicit and worth it? Can others reuse or extend the decision?

### Durability

Will this hold up under repeated use? Can it be maintained, repaired, localized, and adapted? Is the need more durable than the trend?

### Delight

Does the emotional quality clarify purpose, trust, identity, learning, or human connection? Or does it distract from weak function?

### Responsibility

What environmental, economic, social, or human costs are hidden? Does the design distribute effort fairly? What would make it more honest?

## Agent review stance

Peer checks for agents and reviewers.

## Quality bar

The artifact should feel considered after it becomes functional.

Functional is the baseline. Considered is the bar. An artifact is ready when every dimension above has been checked, tradeoffs have been named, and the remaining tensions are documented in the open.

## Field checks

### Poise

Kit One output format on the live lab.

Eight dimensions, holds, tensions, corrections, and keyboard-path proof, with rules adopted into contract v0.1.1.

### Takt

Kit One output format on the interface-feel lab.

Radii, press scale, outlines, hit areas, and stagger: five takt rules adopted into contract v0.1.2.

### Cadence

Kit One output format on the text rhythm lab.

Font smoothing, scale, leading, tracking, measure, text-wrap, tabular numbers, and selection: 10 cadence rules adopted into contract v0.1.3.

### Acoustics

Kit One output format on the interaction sound lab.

Nineteen cues, nineteen roles, Cuelume v0.2.2: nine acoustic mapping rules adopted into contract v0.3.0.

### designesy.org

Public review against design system contract v0.4.6.

Holds, tensions, and standing rules for the live site, including Poise, Takt, Cadence, and Acoustics.

### Keyboard path

Site-wide skip link, tab order, and focus-visible proof.

Shared chrome packet for every public route, complementing the Lab One keyboard path.

Field checks publish when an artifact is live enough to judge. Empty slots are not advertised as upcoming reviews.

## Use this as a kit

### Design Review

Portable package of these dimensions for agents and teams.

Prompt, output format, verification, and anti-patterns, ready to hand off as a shareable path.

## Review against

- [Design system contract — Human home and machine export · Poise + Takt + Cadence + Acoustics](https://www.designesy.org/contracts/design-system)
- [Lab One · Poise — Restrained interaction](https://www.designesy.org/labs/poise)
- [Lab Two · Takt — Interface feel](https://www.designesy.org/labs/takt)
- [Lab Three · Cadence — Text rhythm](https://www.designesy.org/labs/cadence)
- [Lab Four · Acoustics — Interaction sound](https://www.designesy.org/labs/acoustics)
- [Use Kit One · Design Review — Runnable package of these dimensions](https://www.designesy.org/kits/design-review)
